EIGHT YEARS AFTER - TheCypressTimes

Eight years after the Islamic attack upon America the only thing that has changed is America’s divisiveness. There is still a hole in the ground where the twin towers once stood. There was supposed to be a new Freedom Tower there. It took four hundred days to build the empire state building, yet there is a hole in the ground where the Freedom Tower is supposed to be. Oh, and it will no longer be called the Freedom Tower, it will be called the “One World Trade Center Tower”. “One World”, isn’t that special? Combine this with B. Hussein Obama turning the eighth anniversary of the Islamic attack on America into an “interfaith day of service” to be followed up with the prosecution of the CIA interrogators who have helped keep us safe the past eight years and it becomes apparent that Obama is a dhimmi.

Islam invaded and attacked the United States of America. Ever since September 11, 2001 the politicians in America have been trying to pretend it didn’t happen. American politicians along with those on the left, and the politically correct allege that the attackers were a fringe element. Fringe? Madrid, London, Mumbai, Bali, Thailand, Philippines, Somalia, Ethiopia, France, Russia, China, Lebanon and America, that is some fringe. September 10th, 2009 Islam surpassed 14,000 attacks on non-Muslims since September 11, 2009. To “honor” the victims of the attack on America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), is holding a candlelight vigil across from the White House. CAIR is an un-indicted co-conspirator in funding terrorist activities. Why would B. Hussein Obama endorse these activities? He is a dhimmi.

Who decided that the name could not be “Freedom Tower”? Why must it be named “One World Trade Center Tower”? Unless something happened while I slept, we do not have a one world government.

B. Hussein Obama endorsed investigations into the CIA, then he flip-flopped and said this isn’t good. The people on the left of the DNC went off the deep end demanding investigations. B. Hussein Obama has allowed his Attorney General to endorse and begin investigations, so as not to get his hands dirty. But, the mere mention of investigations has had a chilling effect, not only in the CIA, but all other law enforcement agencies, endangering not only America as a whole, but each of us in our daily lives. With over 14,000 Muslim attacks on non- Muslims since the attack on America, only a dhimmi would allow for these things.

B. Hussein Obama has become the head of the UN Security Council. His first meeting is scheduled for 9.24.09 and the agenda was to include banning nuclear weapons in Iran. But, in an act of dhimmitude, the anointed one has decided it would be offensive so, we are now talking about nuclear disarmament for everyone. Has anyone noticed how well that has worked thus far with North Korea and Iran? Obama abandoned six party talks with North Korea. North Korea responds with nuclear weapons testing. On September 25th, 2009 B. Hussein Obama opens Capitol Hill to Islam for a day of prayer. “Our time has come” reads the quote from www.islamoncapitolhill.com. The national prayer gathering of Muslims on the west front of the U.S. Capitol Building will be large, they are expecting at least 50,000 to attend from mosques all across America. They will gather to pray from 4:00 AM until 7:00 PM. The gathering will take place by the site where U.S. Presidents have been inaugurated since 1981. The organizers say that it was Obama's inauguration speech in January and his speech broadcast from Egypt in June that gave them the idea for this prayer gathering on Capitol Hill. Sheik Muhammad Jebril and Sheik Ahmed Dewidar, two Egyptians (home base to the Muslim Brotherhood, a known terrorist front), and prayer organizer Hassen Abdellah are responsible for this atrocity. Dr. Ahmad Dwidar is imam of the Islamic Center in New York:

Dwidar: In 1995 I heard some sermons, saying that Muslims should march on the White House from some of the mosques.
Host: What do you mean by “march on the White House”?
Dwidar: One cleric said in his sermon: “We are going to the White House, so that Islam will be victorious, Allah willing, and the White House will become into the Muslim house.”
Host: How? I don’t understand.
Dwidar: This is simply a slogan. I’m only saying this to...
Host: Are they going to occupy the White House or what?
Dwidar: No, they say that through the domination of Islam and its ideas, the White House will change.

Now, that exchange from 1995 is telling, but so are the Sheik’s words (from Atlas Shrugged website):

Sheik al-Gamei'a returned to Egypt shortly after his interview was translated. Many of his friends in the interfaith community were shocked at what this "moderate" said.
In the interview, he claimed the Jews were behind the September 11 attacks and offered the following as evidence: "four thousand Jews did not come to work at the World Trade Center," and "Jews control decision-making in the airports and in the ... White House and the Pentagon." Another outrageous statement: "Muslims do not feel safe even going to the hospitals, because some Jewish doctors in one of the hospitals poisoned sick Muslim children, who then died." Sheik al-Gamei'a also predicted the collapse of America.

Hassen Abdellah, Esq. is an attorney for terrorists, and prayer leader (once again Pam Gellar provides the insight):

-Mr. Abdellah was the attorney for Faruq Brent, aka Mahmud Al Mutazzim who pled guilty to providing material support for Lashkar-e-Taiba
-Mr. Abdellah is the chairman of the board at Masjid Dar ul Islam Elizabeth
-Mr. Abdellah was the attorney for Mahmoud Abouhalima, who was charged in the bombing of the World Trade Center. During the trial Mr. Abdellah made this statement: Basically, the Government is going to put on trial the concept of Islamic fundamentalism, to prove that their beliefs are contrary to those of the jury and therefore that they bombed the World Trade Center. After the trial he said this: that Islam has many more virtues than tomorrow's headline, “Islamic Fundamentalists Sentenced in the World Trade Center Case.”
-Mr. Abdellah is president of the Muslim Brothers Movement Inc and was inducted into the City of Elizabeth Hall of Fame in 2008
-Mr. Abdellah represented Numan Malafi who was convicted of making false statements to federal agents, according to this report from The New York Times: When the agents questioned him in 2003, he denied helping a Yemeni cleric who prosecutors said made a fund-raising trip to Brooklyn mosques in 1999.
Prosecutors said Mr. Maflahi, a gas station owner who lives in Little Ferry, N.J., had been the driver and personal assistant for Sheik Abdullah Satar, a former member of parliament in Yemen. They have described Sheik Satar as a fund-raiser with ties to Al Qaeda.”Yesterday, Mr. Maflahi's lawyer, Hassen Ibn Abdellah, told Judge Nina Gershon of Federal District Court in Brooklyn that her sentencing decision was a test of whether "this country could be fair to Arab-Americans
-Mr. Abdellah was briefly the lawyer of Mohamed el-Atriss, who was convicted of selling fake IDs to two of the 9/11 hijackers. Atriss did provide the fake IDs, but claimed he did not know what they would be used for. At some point during the case Atriss replaced Mr. Abdellah with another attorney.

The event organizers have said, “Democracy is not revelation, and democracy does not equal freedom, for in democracy you have apartheid, you have slavery, you have homosexuality, you have lesbianism, you have gambling, you have all of the voices that are against the spirit of truth; so no we don’t want to democratize Islam, we want to Islamize democracy. That’s what we want”.

On September 11th, 2001 America was attacked by an enemy that has been at war with western civilization for centuries. We didn’t start this war and judging by the actions of the Dhimmi in Chief, we are not going to finish it. Obama has stated that we are not at war with Islam. However, Islam is at war with us. Jihad is called for in the Koran and mandated by Islam. Jihad is called for in the mosques in America, yet we do nothing. Terrorists train on American soil, yet we do nothing. Unlike what you were taught in school, the Crusades were fought to stop Islamic expansionism in Europe. Our dhimmi leader is doing nothing to stop Islamic expansion into America. While we fight the loss of liberty on other fronts, Dear Dhimmi is sneaking Sharia law through the backdoor and helping his Islamic brothers. The appointment of Harold Koh, who thinks Sharia Law is acceptable, is one of Obama’s key appointees. Islam is not a religion. Islam is a way of life, governed by Sharia Law. It is a blend of politics, theology and fascism. No other religion is like that, because Islam is not a religion.

So, America, what are you going to do about it? Socialism is the road by which Islam takes over America. Once you are accustomed to the government controlling all aspects of your life, through socialism, it is easy to make the leap to Sharia. After all you have comes from the government, when that government offers you the choice of converting to Islam, becoming a dhimmi servant, or death, it will be too late. It is time to get up, stand up and fight for your right to be free, to be an American, to be a sovereign individual, before your choice involves making prayer rugs and death.

Bill Turner
US Western Regional Coordinator
The Patriotic Resistance
www.resistnet.com

Twitter: Czarhunter

Host The Patriotic Resistance Radio
www.phnmedia.com/the-patriotic-resistance

Author Disclaimer: The views of the author do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the staff, editor or publisher of The Cypress Times. The author is solely responsible for the content of this column.

Post A Comment

* Indicates required information

Comments

6 comments for this article

Reverse Comment Order

Added: September 16, 2009. 10:41 AM CST

I have gained

a tremendous amount of respect for you Zander. I thought you blindly followed the leftist ideology, lock step. Thank you for sharing this.

Bill Turner

Alert a moderator

Added: September 16, 2009. 05:45 AM CST

Me too.

A pious and misguided multiculturalism can lead to the misguided idea that we should treat people who tell us, "Deny that Islam is a violent religion or we will behead you", as if they had peaceful intentions.

I am appalled by the death threats against Salman Rushdie and by the controversy over the Danish cartoons of Muhammad (let's repost them here!).

One percent of Muslims residing in Britain believe in the violent overthrow of the British state and its replacement by sharia. That's 20,000 people.

The plain fact is that not everyone wishes us well, that Islam is often taught and learned in a way that is hostile to American and Enlightenment principles, and that it is not unjust to recognize that fact.

This is not "Islamophobia": I reject and condemn utterly any person who believes in spreading his or her religion by force.

Zander

Alert a moderator

Added: September 15, 2009. 07:23 PM CST

I wish I could have this page bronzed

Zander, I cannot believe we agree on something. But, at least it is something important, the threat to America posed by Islam. Let us hope that Americans wake up before it is too late.

Bill Turner

Alert a moderator

Added: September 15, 2009. 06:03 AM CST

I agree with you here.

What I was saying was, first, not that they should not be allowed to spread their radical religion in America, but that they should not be allowed to spread it by force.

Second, I was saying that for those wishing to become US citizens, Americans should require that they do not support the violent replacement of American law with sharia law (in the same way as we impose other conditions, like not having been associated with the Third Reich).

In Qur'anic Islam, it is the duty of the government to promote Islam, in the same way as the Deuteronomic historian considered it to be a core duty of the kings of Israel to promote monotheism and suppress polytheism. That is what's incompatible with the First Amendment. In the Muslim caliphates, Christians, Jews and those of other religions generally were not forced to convert, but were disabled from many public offices and were subject to a special tax.

Perhaps it is surprising for you that a liberal (and therefore of course a Marxist, communist, fascist lover of genocide and hater of all things good, right and American :-)) feels this way. But in common with people like the assassinated Pim Fortuyn, I see radical Islam as a threat to liberal values such as equal rights for gays and lesbians, as well as to more universally agreed upon values like free speech and democracy.

Zander

Alert a moderator

Added: September 14, 2009. 04:01 PM CST

Zander Answer A Question For Me

What is it that is expressed in the first amendment that islam is not compatible with? While I detest their intolerance and the fact that they use religion to mask their way of life, they have every right, if an American, to say what they choose, whether we like it or not. You see, the first amendment says congress shall pass no law infringing upon our right to free speech. Free speech is an inalienable, God given right, that we have from birth. I do not like what Islam says, but if in America, they have a right to say it and I have a right to oppose it.

Bill Turner

Alert a moderator

Added: September 14, 2009. 07:53 AM CST

Religion and the US way of life

Radical Islam is indeed hostile to our way of life, and to the secularity of our constitution.

Jihad, one of the Five Pillars of Islam, is, and has throughout Islamic history generally been understood to be, the spreading of Islam by force.

There are many Muslims who prefer to reinterpret the Qur'an so as to think of jihad as an internal struggle against sin. That is a less literal reading, and I genuinely hope that their view becomes a dominant one within Islam. Most Muslims in America are not looking to wage holy war on anybody; most people like a quiet life.

What this means is that fundamentalist Islam, that considers the Qur'an to be an undisputable divine revelation, is not compatible with the value expressed in the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and a fundamentalist Muslim could not have written it. It is part of the intrinsic business of a Qur'anic Muslim state to promote Islam and to either gradually and peaceably, or violently and suddenly, suppress other religions.

This is not to say that there are not parts of the Christian scriptures that could be read the same way, and have been read the same way in the past. The centuries-long narrative of the invasion of Canaan by the Israelites is full of cases where God is represented as approving of executing unbelievers. The Deuteronomic narrative is all about how rulers that promote monotheism are favored by God, and rulers that allow varieties of religious practice are not favored by God.

However, a much higher proportion of Christians have come to a less literal understanding of the Bible, where they consider these violent narratives not to impose a command for similar behavior upon them personally.

Because of that development, which results from the Enlightenment (which never came to the Muslim world), the worldwide threat of violent Christian fundamentalism to the values of the First Amendment is much, much smaller than the threat of violent Muslim fundamentalism.

Where Mr. Turner and I differ is not on whether there is a disease, but on the appropriate cures.

I see no reason why people should not be required by law to practice the First Amendment in their own lives by refraining from attempting to spread their own religious beliefs by force. It is simply not acceptable in a country with a secular government to allow forcible conversions, or to award citizenship to people who approve of them, or who believe that the US Constitution should be replaced by sharia law.

It is also unfortunate, and true, that the belief that the Jews planned 9/11 to make Muslims look bad is a reasonably common one in the Muslim world, with up to one-third of Muslims believing it. Anti-Semitism is common in school textbooks, and the news is full of the bodies of Palestinian children killed in Israeli attacks. We cannot command their curriculum, but we can certainly condition American aid and trade on the removal of such stuff.

We should also be actively promoting the translation of the core texts of American democracy, very few of which are translated or read by Arabic speakers.

We should be funding high-quality secular education in countries where the only education boys can get is in memorizing the Qur'an.

This is a war, but it is a war of ideas. I firmly believe that in a fair fight, our ideas will win. We do not need to bomb Muslim countries into submission in order to win this war; all we need is the inherent worth and virtue of American ideals.

Zander

Alert a moderator

Reverse Comment Order