tct main 2010
 
 Web  TheCypressTimes  
PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S WAR ON TIM TEBOW SUPERBOWL COMMERCIAL A WAR ON ALL HUMANITY

Planned Parenthood has released a commercial of their own to answer the Tim Tebow Superbowl ad- which we haven't even seen yet.  You can see Planned Parenthood's video here.

It has been with sadness, disgust, anger, and even humor that I have observed the response to the news that the pro-life community would dare issue a 'divisive' issue ad at the Superbowl.  By 'response' I think we have to mean 'frothing at the mouth incoherence.'  For just one example out of many, consider Gloria Allred's accusation that the ad, yet unseen, is deceptive because the ad does not state that abortion had been illegal in the Philippines when Tim's mother was given the option to abort.

If anything, it is just plain silly to suggest that a 30 second ad should- and can- deal with every trifling detail.  Megyn Kelly on FoxNews presented this and generally trounced Gloria Allred through intelligent questioning, revealing how desperate the pro-abortionists are in reacting to the Tebow ad. 

My wife and I were also given the option to abort our daughter when we discovered that our daughter had spina bifida- a 'choice' that was similar to the one Tebow's mother made.  (You can see our story here)  In my experience discussing this, it has been amazing how angry people have gotten when I present our story.  How dare we present the fact that we chose life?  How dare we impose our views on others?

The insanity is obvious:  the mere presentation of our views is not at all an imposition.  We are led to believe that the 'pro-choice' advocates really want people to make informed choices but judging from the hostility when the choice for life is presented, the only side that Planned Parenthood wants people to hear is their side;  the only choice they really honor and respect is the choice to abort.  People who choose life should sit down and shut up. 

This is implied in Gloria Allred's assertion that the Tebow ad is "religiously inspired."  Gloria uses this talking point because she is aiming to convince the muddle-minded that CBS should drop the ad because she knows that there are some people who have a knee jerk reaction against the idea of someone imposing their religion.  Given the fact that billions of people are now on the planet, this would seem to be prima facie evidence that if a preference towards choosing life exists is a 'religiously inspired' one, it is one that the vast swath of humanity has in common.

I don't mean to accept the terms of Gloria's argument, mind you.  She's expressing the prevalent secular humanist view that one can only have secular reasons and motives for interacting within secular society, which I don't buy.  I'm just explaining the nature of her appeal and her target audience.

I say all of this in the hopes of reaching out to my own target audience- that great mass of individuals who call themselves 'moderate' and feel dirty if they take a position that some other person might feel is extreme.  I want you to notice the extremes that Planned Parenthood and other pro-choice groups are going to in their abject horror of someone simply telling the story of how they chose life.  How can such organizations be at war with the human race, which itself only exists because humans have overwhelmingly chosen life?

I want you to think about this:  in their view, if you have a baby, and want to state your reasons for it, you must be silenced because your views are 'religiously inspired.'

They are not being truthful about their real goals and purposes.  If they say it is about 'choice' in one breath, but become enraged if anyone even talks about making a choice for life, a reasonable person would infer that there is something going on.  You would do well to find out what it is and stop being onlookers:  it is a war, even if you don't know it, and organizations like Planned Parenthood are counting on you to do your part... which is essentially just to stay out of their way, sit down, and shut up... while they do.... well, it's up to you to figure out that part.

Anthony Horvath is the Executive Director of Athanatos Christian Ministries and the author of the Birth Pangs series.  He is a member of the National Lutherans for Life's Speaker's bureau.  His pro-life site is www.wechoselife.com.

Post A Comment
* Indicates required information
Comment Title:
* Comments:
Nickname:
* Validation:
Comments 5 comments for this article
Added: February 07, 2010. 11:47 PM CST
Who said they didn't support the ad?
Actually, it seems to me that they didn't support the ad but were smart enough to send surrogates out there and then discovered (just in time?) that they had picked the losing strategy.

You can see the talking points even in what you posted, I quote: "...She decided to continue her pregnancy against medical advice..." You see, they can't resist taking a shot even while ostensibly supporting Tebow's decision. How many pro-choice women think its admirable for women to go 'against medical advice'? Not many. See the Maddow video I posted in a related column here: http://sntjohnny.com/front/planned-parenthoods-superbowl-battle/778.html

Maddow uses the same language. Interesting, no?

Anyway, my column didn't say that PP did not support the ad, whatever that means. I said that it was at war with it, which is different. Where did I say that PP wanted the ad suppressed? I didn't. But that doesn't mean they were happy about the ad. And even a cursory read of the press release I posted to shows that they wanted to link the add to those 'extremists,' aka, Focus on the Family.

But seriously, if we're going to be honest with ourselves here, do we REALLY think PP is happy the Tebow ad ran? Seriously. They're on damage control, big time.

So, speaking of strawmen... you're accusing me of an accusation I didn't make.

Not a very wonderful debate tactic after all, eh? ;)
Anthony H
Added: February 06, 2010. 04:16 PM CST
Horvath, read this: Planned Parenthood supports the ad!!!
A wonderful debate tactic is the setting up of a straw dog argument - a non-existent position represented by one's opponent - for the sake of refuting it. I received this today from Planned Parenthood. It completely endorses Mrs Tebow's decision and objects in no way to tomorrow's ad:

Dear Jeff,

By now you've most likely heard all about it — the anti-choice group Focus on the Family is spending millions to run an ad during the Super Bowl featuring football player Tim Tebow and his mom talking about a deeply personal medical decision she made years ago. She decided to continue her pregnancy against medical advice, due to what had been diagnosed as a high-risk pregnancy.

People have been asking us at Planned Parenthood what we think about the ad and Mrs. Tebow's decision. It's simple. Planned Parenthood respects the right of every woman to make important medical decisions for herself.

Mrs. Tebow weighed medical and moral considerations and decided what was right for her. She made her choice in private, and without government interference. That's exactly what we want every woman to be able to do.

The truth is, the Tebows' experience is completely consistent with what Planned Parenthood doctors and nurses have learned from the millions of women they've served over nearly a century. Women take decisions about their health very seriously. They consider their doctors' advice, they talk with their loved ones and people they trust, including religious leaders, and they carefully weigh all considerations before making the best decision for themselves and their families.

That's the way it should be. And that should be our shared goal — on Super Bowl Sunday and every day.

I hope you'll show your support for ensuring that every woman makes her own personal medical decisions by adding your name to a brief statement from Planned Parenthood.

Thank you for joining with us today.

Sincerely,

Cecile Richards, President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
Anonymous
Added: February 04, 2010. 03:19 PM CST
There is no lie, only the accusation of one
Anonymous "Truth is not Trivial": Of course, if Mrs. Tebow was lying then certainly that is relevant. However, as far as I know there is no one who disputes that she was given the option to have an abortion. That would be a lie if she had not. If it had been illegal to have an abortion, that does not make her choice for life a lie.

One almost gets the impression from that line of argument that if a person chooses life simply because it is against the law to do otherwise then there is nothing noble about choosing life. Besides being ridiculous, this line of argument is far from deceptive. Was she invited to have an abortion, or not?

An open question is whether or not the Philippines allowed for an abortion in cases where the health of the mother was at stake at that time, in which case this situation is reversed... it is Gloria Allred who would be lying by trying to make this argument.

Granted, it may be less noble for a person to choose life because of fear of legal consequence, but that is a far cry from a 'lie.' Gloria's accusation is over the top and nothing more than an attempt to distort the issue.

As long as the ad comports to the truth, it cannot be called a lie. I mean, that's just a tautology. But Gloria did not attack the ad based on anything that could actually speak to the ad's veracity... which makes a certain amount of sense since none of us have seen it yet.
Anthony H
Added: February 04, 2010. 01:46 PM CST
Pro choice equals pro abortion
Gloria Allred is a classic example of what's wrong with this country. There's no way that killing a million babies a year is a good thing. Regardless of the laws in the Phillippines, we've got a serious problem over here. And lest we forget, Barack Obama's mother had the same choice to abort her son, and she didn't. That ad was going to air last year during the Super Bowl, but NBC wouldn't run it. I applaud CBS for having the guts to stick to their guns.
Anonymous
Added: February 04, 2010. 12:50 PM CST
The truth is not trivial
With all due respect, the fact that Mr. Tebow's mother is likely lying about the incident is hardly a "trifling detail." I am not defending abortion, but if we're going to tell stories to make public arguments, we ought to be sure they are truthful.
Anonymous
Reader Login
Username:
Password:
 Save Login?
Free Sign-up
Forgot Password?
Reader Control Panel
Our Newest Articles