Sarah Palin is rightfully a happy woman tonight. Why? Because after all of
her hard work as Governor, Alaskans, and really all Americans, are finally
going to be able to access one of the richest oil and natural gas deposits in
America.
We were looking for something from Sarah tonight, and this comes as a nice surprise:
“Drill, Baby, Drill… Even Off-Shore
“I commend Interior Secretary Salazar’s decision today to conditionally
approve drilling at three exploratory wells in the Chukchi Sea off the
northwest coast of Alaska; it’s a decision that’s been a long time coming. The
area north of the Arctic Circle contains some of the world’s richest oil and
gas reserves. U.S. Geological Survey researchers estimate that it contains 1.6
trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 83 billion barrels of undiscovered oil.
“The international community recognizes the potential of Arctic off-shore
drilling; it’s about time our government allowed us to compete with them by
developing these rich reserves in an environmentally responsible way. As I said
last April in my testimony before the Secretary during a federal hearing in
Anchorage, “Alaska’s oil and gas resources can and should be a major part of
the implementation of any creditable energy plan for our nation. Alaska has
proven that these resources can be developed safely, but Arctic exploration and
development is a slow, demanding process. Delays or major restrictions in
accessing these resources for environmentally responsible development are not
in the national interest or the interests of the State of Alaska.”
“As an Alaskan and an American, I am very grateful for the decision today
because it is a step in the right direction toward prosperity for Alaska and
energy independence and security for America. - Sarah Palin”
This is actually quite a development today considering that Obama’s hand
appointed radicals over at the Environmental Protection Agency just declared
the very air you breath “dangerous.” Or more specifically, they declared
the air you EXHALE dangerous.
We’ve written for months about the radical crazies that have hijacked the
so-called “green” movement. We’ve written how these communists are using
the global warming hoax to gain unprecedented governmental powers and control
over the population.
The communists intend to use the greatest lie ever told (global warming) as
an excuse to re-distribute wealth on a global scale. Ahhh, the Marxist’s dream.
To the point:Now, for the first time
in history, the radical, out of control, Environmental Protection Agency has
declared a naturally occurring substance, in this case, carbon dioxide, a
danger to human health.
Carbon dioxide has existed for billions of years. It is an essential element
for all plant life to exist. For those who never actually went to school, which
is evidently everyone at the EPA, most in Congress, and most certainly all of
those in the White House: Humans need oxygen to breath, to live. In one of the neatest bits of our creator’s
engineering, plant life, in turn, needs carbon dioxide to live.
Again, for those without the benefit of schooling: Humans, animals, and even
fish, breath in oxygen, and exhale carbon dioxide. (CO2) But this is OK,
because plants take in CO2 and through photosynthesis, “exhale” oxygen.
This is one of the most ingenious set ups in all of nature.
This is why what the EPA has done is ludicrous to anyone with a lick of
common sense. If CO2 was truly a bad thing, the solution would be as simple as
planting more trees. Oh wait! We already do that!
“WASHINGTON – The Environmental Protection Agency took a major step Monday
toward regulating greenhouses gases, concluding that climate changing pollution
threatens the public health and the environment.
“The announcement came as the Obama administration looked to boost its
arguments at an international climate conference that the United States is
aggressively taking actions to combat global warming, even though Congress has
yet to act on climate legislation. The conference opened Monday in Copenhagen.
“The EPA said that the scientific evidence surrounding climate change clearly
shows that greenhouse gases ‘threaten the public health and welfare of the
American people’ and that the pollutants — mainly carbon dioxide from
burning fossil fuels — should be regulated under the Clean Air Act.
“’These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year
when the United States government began addressing the challenge of
greenhouse-gas pollution,’ said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson at news
conference.
“The action by the EPA, which has been anticipated for months, clearly was
timed to add to the momentum toward some sort of agreement on climate change at
the Copenhagen conference and try to push Congress to approve climate
legislation.
“’This is a clear message to Copenhagen of the Obama administration’s
commitments to address global climate change,’ said Sen. John Kerry,
D-Mass., lead author of a climate bill before the Senate. ‘The message to
Congress is crystal clear: get moving.’
“Under a Supreme Court ruling, the so-called endangerment finding is needed
before the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases
released from automobiles, power plants, and factories under the federal Clean
Air Act.
“The EPA signaled last April that it was inclined to view heat-trapping
pollution as a threat to public health and welfare and began to take public
comments under a formal rulemaking. The action marked a reversal from the Bush
administration, which had refused before leaving office to issue the finding,
despite a conclusion by EPA scientists that it was warranted.
“Business groups have strongly argued against tackling global warming
through the Clean Air Act, saying it is less flexible and more costly than the
cap-and-trade bill being considered before Congress. On Monday, some of those
groups questioned the timing of the EPA’s announcement, calling it political.
“’The implications of today’s action by EPA are far-reaching…individual
Americans and consumers and businesses alike will be dramatically affected by
this decision,’ said Charles T. Drevna, the president of the National
Petrochemical & Refiners Association. Drevna, in a statement, said “it is
hardly the time to risk the remainder of the U.S. industrial sector in an
attempt to achieve a short-term international public relations victory.”
The EPA and the Obama administration threatened to do this when their
cap-and-tax bill first began to stall out. The determination of CO2 as a
pollutant — which is patently ridiculous on its face — allows the White House
to bypass Congress and begin dictating to producers on carbon emissions
reductions.
In other words, this is yet another end run around Congress by the most
radical and corrupt President in our nation’s 233 year history. A total usurpation
of our Constitution’s separation of powers. It violates the idea of checks and
balances our founders built into government.
This little ruling by the EPA gives them virtually unlimited power to
regulate, literally, every facet of your life.
By classifying CO2 and methane (among other so-called greenhouse gases) it
can inject itself into just about every industry in the US.
Energy production will be its primary target, but the EPA has also gone
after coal mining on the basis of the Clean Water Act. It will certainly not be
shy about using this new authority to kill coal mining altogether.
Now don’t forget that coal is our most abundant form of energy in America!
We have several hundred years worth at present rate of usage.
Also, don’t forget, that China uses a lot of coal fired plants to generate
electricity, and they couldn’t care less about the quality of air in the world.
They don’t have the environmental protection mandates we do. Never will.
This nonsense will also impact agriculture, especially dairies and cattle
ranching, as well as transportation. The entire manufacturing sector will have
to answer for its “carbon output.”
To put it gently, cow farts are now considered hazardous, and if you eat at
Taco Bell a lot…..
This sort of thing would be funny if these loons weren’t serious.
This really is the worst of all outcomes. The EPA process can be restrained
by Congress, but it will take positive action for that to happen, and in most
cases, would take capitulation from Barack Obama himself. Not likely from
someone who thinks like this:
You can find an explanation of my views on global warming...
...on this site, at http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/Columnists/The_View_From_Left_Field/HOW_MANY_IS_ENOUGH_DEFINING_A_CONSENSUS_ON_HUMANCAUSED_GLOBAL_WARMING/24337.
A few odd phrases in a vast volume of emails may serve to confirm your prior prejudices, but they are unlikely to overturn the science.
Basically, I go by what a roughly 95% majority of climate scientists active in the field believe, which is that global warming is occurring and that human activities are contributing to it. I claim no specialist knowledge - I take it you don't either - so on this one, I go with the experts. What basis do you have for not doing so?
Do you stake your claim of "Science" on climate research before or after the revelation that the books and science were cooked and manipulated by the scientists involved? Are you so naive as to think that "Global Warming" is not big business?
Even CBS has had to finally acknowledge (after ignoring the story for weeks) that there are Serious questions about the validity of "climate science" and the findings that global warming even exists. But you know for a fact that, "The result, over the medium to long term, is a warming of the climate of the earth."
An amount of carbon dioxide production that the planet would be able to absorb would be just fine. The problem is not that we breathe; the problem is that the particular industrial and transportation techniques we use produce more carbon dioxide, methane and other gases than the planet is able to absorb.
The result, over the medium to long term, is a warming of the climate of the earth.
I might, on a personal level, relish it getting a little warmer here in Massachusetts today; but we already have an example of how this process can end, in the form of Earth's "twin" planet Venus. I would rather we took action to stop overburdening the planet before our great-grandchildren lose it; it's not like we've got a spare.