January 22, 1973 is a day that lives in infamy. On that day seven men decided that unborn babies are not human and can be murdered with impunity. Since then, 39 years later, 50 million innocent human beings have been slaughtered in the name of a woman’s right to choose. 50 million! That is a number far greater that those murdered by Hitler. That number is greater than those murdered by Stalin. So why do we as a nation consider these men monsters for the atrocities they are guilty of and yet continue to commit greater atrocities within the abortion mills of America? Because America has increasingly come under a satanic influence and is no longer capable of distinguishing right from wrong or good from evil.

An example of this was the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States, an election made possible because “Christians” fell into lock step behind his charismatic persona and the promise of economic prosperity. These “Christians” sold their souls for the prom...

[Read More]

“The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” is a brutal and pornographic “R” rated movie that is the subject of a blog on christianitytoday.com authored by Karen Swallow Prior, a professor at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. She took in this movie as a “Girls’ Night Out” event. Given the subject matter of this movie that seems like an odd choice for a group of women. But times have changed. Consuming pornographic entertainment has now been mainstreamed to the point that it is now an equal-gender activity – even by those who have taken the name “Christian”.

I have not seen this movie, nor will I. What I know about it comes from advertisements and the reviews of others. Assuming what these reviews have said is true it is obvious this movie is unfit for human consumption, particularly Christian consumption.

One gentleman responding...

[Read More]

Because of our particular political system the American government is a reflection of the values, morals, and ethics the American people actually hold. That includes those who refer to themselves as evangelical Christians because no politician could get elected without the “Christian” vote in America. And given the anti-Biblical values, morals and ethics some of our elected officials ascribe to, that truth is a stunning indictment of the state of American Christianity. It reveals the spiritual poverty American Christians have chosen to willfully live in.

Our government legalized the murder of unborn children in 1973 and year after year politicians who make no secret of their pro-abortion beliefs, beliefs that they staunchly defend by voting against any restrictions on this massacre of innocent human life and/or appointing judges that will further solidify the abortion industry’s ability to continue this holocaust, are elected and re-elected with votes from those who have tak...

[Read More]

God very much cares about why we offer sacrifice and service to Him, what our intent and motives are. Just being religious in no way makes our service, or us, acceptable to the Lord. Such lip service, such self-righteous worship, is built upon a foundation of sand that will result in the destruction of anything resting upon it when the Lord shakes it, whether that shaking is natural or supernatural.

On September 11th, 2001, America was shaken. Two icons of American strength were attacked, the first being the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the heart of America’s financial might, and the Pentagon, the heart of America’s military might. The symbolism of these buildings was likely part of the reason the terrorists chose them. They wanted to show the vulnerability of the greatest nation on earth; they wanted to shake America. They succeeded. America will never be the same. The security we experienced by having the largest and most powerful economy in the world, a...

[Read More]

This is part 4 of a 4-part series that addresses the issue of female reporters in men's locker rooms. Part 4 examines one last argument used by female reporters and feminists to justify robbing male athletes of their basic human right to privacy.

It also addresses the blatant hypocrisy of those who support this injustice and offers a solution to issue.

THE “IT’S THE LAW” ARGUMENT

Brennan’s arrogance is further revealed when she tried to silence those who speak out against females in men’s locker rooms by tweeting: “ #NFL has had equal access policy since 1985 for men/women reporters. It's the law and a done deal, folks. Next topic.” This is the “Non-Issue Argument” raised to a higher level. Brennan seems to believe if something is the law that is the end of the matter. Would she believe that if ...

[Read More]

This is Part 3 of a 4-part series on the issue of female reporters being allowed in male locker rooms.

Part 3 examines two more female reporters and feminists use to justify robbing male athletes of their rights.

MALE REPORTERS ALLOWED IN WOMEN’S LOCKER ROOM ARGUMENT

One of the most frequent objections female reporters and feminists face when trying to justify their presence in men’s locker rooms is: “Men are not allowed in women’s locker rooms”. They quickly point out that men are allowed in women’s locker rooms. Is this true? Technically, yes.

AWSM emphasizes “that equal access to the locker room for male reporters covering women’s teams is the norm. The WNBA, for instance, has an equal-access locker room policy as does the NCAA women’s basketball tournament.” This statement would make one think male reporters have access to female locker rooms while the...

[Read More]

Part 1 of this series gave a brief overview of how an activist judiciary legalized the presence of females in male locker rooms. It mentioned what happens to male athletes that take exception to having their right to privacy violated when females are in their locker rooms. It further revealed the considerable power of the Association for Women in Sports Media, a feminist organization, to enforce this legalized sexual harassment toward male athletes.

Part 2 examines a few of the arguments female reporters and feminists use to justify robbing male athletes of their rights.

THE PROFESSIONAL ARGUMENT

Female reporters justify their presence in men’s locker rooms by saying they are professionals doing their job – just like male reporters. Part of the policy recently sent to all 32 NFL teams reads: “Please rememb...

[Read More]

Over the last 40 years the public workplace has changed. It went from being a largely male realm to a more balanced one in regard to the sexes. Women now work outside the home in numbers essentially equal to that of men. With this influx of female workers into the public workplace it has undergone possibly the greatest transformation since the beginning of the Industrial Age. The presence of females in a previously all-male environment required men to take down pornographic or semi-pornographic pictures from their work area and cartoons or jokes posted on walls that were deemed offensive to women were likewise banished as businesses faced charges of sexual harassment or fostering hostile work environments if they did not conform to the sensitivities of the new egalitarian workforce. This is as it should be. No woman should be subjected to images, words, or behavior in the workplace (or anywhere else) that degrades or humiliates her. But neither should men.

The Femin...

[Read More]

In 2009 the seven judges of the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously voted to overturn Iowa’s marriage statute limiting marriage to one man and one woman. Joining the homosexual tsunami that is destroying the moral foundation of America they concluded that Iowa’s marriage law violated the equal protection clause of both the Iowa State Constitution and the Federal Constitution. Justice Mark S. Cady writing the court’s decision, said:“On our review, we hold the Iowa marriage statute violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution”.The decision shocked the nation as Iowa, a mid-western state in the heart of America, joined a small number of northeastern states that sanction same-sex unions. (To call such unions “marriages” denigrates this God-created institution. It will be referred to as “marriage” only when quoting others or when necessary to avoid co...

[Read More]

Want an example of just how mainstreamed pornography has become in our society? Pornographic books, magazines, and entertainment use to hide in the shadows of darkness. This provided welcome cover for those who wished to view obscene material with a minimal chance of their activities being discovered. That was important to them because they realized that most of society considered such material as immoral and those who consumed it as “dirty old men”. They knew they were risking their reputations and possibly their careers if they were discovered patronizing pornographic businesses. Thus, these businesses shunned the light of day where the anonymity of their customers had a much greater opportunity of being compromised. But no longer. The shame of viewing pornography and enjoying pornographic entertainment has diminished to the point that “daylight” businesses and organizations now sell, promote, and facilitate it. And in a triumph for sexual equality “dirty old women” have now taken...

[Read More]